Path-Q Solar
What information should I gather before comparing solar ownership with a third-party agreement?
Answer
Gather comparable system designs, total costs, payment terms, production and degradation assumptions, warranty and maintenance responsibilities, and exit or transfer terms. Compare ownership and a third-party agreement over the same expected period and usage assumptions, including obligations that may affect a future sale or move.
Key points
- For ownership, include cash or financing cost, maintenance, replacements, warranties, and retained system value.
- For third-party arrangements, include payment escalators, minimum terms, buyout or termination rules, and production guarantees.
- Compare who owns incentives or other benefits, who handles repairs, and who controls the monitoring account.
- Model low-production, roof-work, sale, relocation, and end-of-term scenarios.
What it depends on
- System design and expected energy use
- Financing or agreement terms
- Ownership, maintenance, and warranty allocation
- Expected property ownership and exit timing
Risks and trade-offs
- Lower initial payment does not necessarily mean lower total cost.
- Third-party contracts can create transfer or cancellation constraints.
- Ownership provides more control but places performance, repair, and financing risk on the owner.
Information you may need
- Complete purchase, loan, lease, or service agreement
- Production model and degradation assumptions
- All fees, escalators, buyout, transfer, and termination terms
- Warranty, maintenance, replacement, and monitoring responsibilities
Your next step
What to do next
Create a side-by-side lifecycle comparison using the same system output, ownership period, and exit assumptions before choosing a structure.
Path-Q
Find the right next step
Answer a few questions and we’ll narrow your options.
Loading…
SQ02073